| Inspections |
Resolved |
Please provide all structural information and calculations required per IBC, chapter 16 used in the design of the foundation. |
| Inspections |
Resolved |
What is the soil bearing capacity used for the design of this foundation? Please provide along with a copy of a geotechnical report, if applicable. |
| Inspections |
Resolved |
Plans show detail that looks like an elevator pit. Please note - sump is not allowed in elevator pit. |
| Inspections |
Resolved |
Verify the required accessible parking stalls - numbers and types per IBC, chapter 11. |
| Planning |
Resolved |
Parking does not meet. The project requires 22 parking stalls, the applicant has provided 14 stalls on site
|
| Engineering |
Resolved |
1. Add the following note to Sheet C-2 or all other Sheet showing work in the right-of-way (RoW): “Excavation or other work in the right-of-way shall require a Traffic Control Plan that meets all Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) requirements. This plan is required before any permits to work in the right-of-way will be issued.” |
| Engineering |
Resolved |
2. On Sheet C-5, add the following note: “Contractor shall coordinate with the City of Fargo Mains and Hydrants Department for all wet-tapping operations.” |
| Engineering |
Resolved |
3. On Sheet C-5, regarding the new storm pipe tying into the NW side of the alley inlet, either drop the new pipe to the bottom of the inlet (invert = 894.78) or replace the PVC with RCP pipe. |
| Engineering |
Resolved |
4. On Sheet C-5, add the following note: “The City of Fargo Inspections Department must be notified to inspect the connection of the site stormwater system to the City stormwater system. Ensure the excavation is kept open for this inspection.” |
| Engineering |
Resolved |
5. On Sheet C-3, ensure the contractor opens up all demolition areas in University Drive at the same time, and completes all the work in University drive as quickly as possible. 10 May21 - note was added to plans. Discussed with Kevin G - RoW Use Agreement not required. Comment is closed. |
| Engineering |
Resolved |
6. This is just a question/observation – it seems the sanitary could be simplified greatly by coming out the front of the building in 2 locations. Is this not possible? |
| Engineering |
Resolved |
7. On Sheet C-3, has there been coordination with the neighbor to the south regarding demolition of half the approach? Also, at that location, are you re-paving the N-side flare on the approach? It is not shown on the paving plan. Lastly, if the neighbor is OK with total removal, that may be easier than partial removal. 10 May21 - Neighbor not OK with removal, per Andrew Thill, project Civil Engineer. Comment is closed |